Dec 3, 2009

Louis Vuitton Bulle Bag

Perhaps I am just not fashion forward enough because this is just not stylish to my eyes. I must be missing the point. This bag is supposed to invoke the idea of romantic sea, but how? Is it the cotton cord? I know it's a Louis Vuitton but I seriously have an issue spending $1170 for the PM size (small in front) and $2330 for the GM size (large drawstring in back), especial when it is made of nylon. Well, I think I have less of an issue with the material. Rather it is the print that totally turns me off the bag. For $2330 I can almost buy a classic Chanel. This just proves most expensive is not necessarily the best. What do you think, savvy or not?

P.S. Don't forget to enter Marc Jacob Giveaway on the right hand bar. xoxo SG

35 comments:

  1. They look great, but I'll never spend big money for one of them.

    Secretia

    ReplyDelete
  2. The LV Bulls MM looks (and feels) great! The ropes give such a nautical feeling, each detail is meticulously done and the whole bag evokes the feeling of easiness, utmost elegance and luxury.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nylon? Yuck!! No, I don't think that they are worth that at all!

    ReplyDelete
  4. While I love most nautical items, this isn't doing it for me. I'm getting tired of companies splashing logos all over accessories

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree plus the blue color is not my thing!

    ReplyDelete
  6. euf, i agree with you. whole-heartedly.

    ReplyDelete
  7. definitely not a fan in the least.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I dont think they are worth it too.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I love it, but I don't love it enough. Lol. I think I'll spend my thousand dollars on something else. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  10. This LV is not just for me. I have a problem spending so much money on something that I know I wouldn't use often enough, even if it's an LV. I don't like the logo being all over the place too.
    - Kaith

    ReplyDelete
  11. Ugh, I've never loved the LV mono that much and it looks glaringly showy here. Seriously that $ is better spent on Chanel!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Yeah I agree. Maybe if the logos were smaller and it was made out of better material, but even then I don't know...

    ReplyDelete
  13. Not my style....too...preppy?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Not savvy at all. I'm not liking this look. The shape isn't nice. Plus, I bet a lot of fake versions will pop up.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Lovely blue color but I'm not a fan of the bag, so tired of that always the same boring LV sign..

    Thank you so much for stopping by!
    posh-dailystyle.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  16. I don't like it at all... Hahaha! I hate big logos and the Bulle bag is screaming logo.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The oversized logo print is too distracting and kind of vulgar.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I'd rather have a classic LV!

    ReplyDelete
  19. looks fake and ugggglllyyyy!

    ReplyDelete
  20. I don't like it...Chanel is better!!

    ReplyDelete
  21. I like these bags...well, except for the handle. I'm not into the rope look.

    ReplyDelete
  22. i just saw those in the store and was really turned off by the rope thing.

    ReplyDelete
  23. barf. i hate it. and i usually hate stuff with logos all over it. i think it is tacky. sorry lv, as i know this is your schtick. i hate it. :[

    ReplyDelete
  24. There's a certain look to it. I can definitely see this looking gorgeous with some good taste. Really depends on your style! However, I'm not a huge fan of monogram logos. And since when is a bag REALLY REALLY worth it?? Splurge. :)

    xo

    ReplyDelete
  25. Love the pictures, they're great!

    http://stoleninspiration.blogspot.com/

    come check me out and follow if you like :)

    ReplyDelete
  26. I'm kind of "meh" about it. I like LV when it's creative and interesting and that is kind of boring for the price. I wouldn't bother with it :-)

    ReplyDelete
  27. I like them, but that is just way too much money to spend. I can't see forking over that much.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I'm not a fan of them either. Like you, I would rather have a Chanel.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I'm gonna have to agree with you here. I'm not feeling the price tag.

    ReplyDelete
  30. The person who okay-ed that should be fired. Hurts my eyes. :(

    ReplyDelete
  31. Oh I don't know . It's like a cheap bag , I don't know why . And I agreed , Chanel is so much better . Everyone can see the big difference I guess .

    ReplyDelete
  32. LOL. I'd have to agree with you, those bags are not romantic at all.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Collection people, collection! Wait until you held one, it's fun, elegance, feel good in and out (of you). It's all relative, it's all about how one views it. I am sure, all of you above, when you DO have that kind of money to spend, you would have gotten one too...be real!

    ReplyDelete
  34. I am sure everyone has different opinion of what is reasonable and what is not. What is fun and stylish to one person is not to another. There are def. pieces regardless of the price and, may not be stylish in the eye of the beholder as we all have different taste.

    ReplyDelete

Love to hear your thought.....